Exposing Hillary So She Won't Get Elected

Breaking News: Hillary Answers Questions – Seven After 30 Days (And Here They Are)

The Hillary Campaign is so poorly run and mismanaged that it’s “breaking news” when she answers a question.

Which she finally did – after an entire month of not taking a single question, Hillary deigned to respond to the hoards of press this week and answer a total of seven questions.

The first one might not even count, it basically was: “Will you please answer some questions from the press?” Which got the snotty response: “I’ll have to ponder it, but I will put it on my list for due consideration.”

The other six questions – remember, the press had an entire month to think of these – range from stupid, to repetitive to a few good ones. Courtesy of NPR, here are the other six questions, along with their answers. Try to figure out if she said anything revealing or if the “news” what she even addressed a damn question. I don’t think she directly answered any of them:

  1. “Secretary Clinton, do you regret the way that the Clinton foundation handled foreign donations when you were secretary of state? And your opponents say that the foreign donations and private emails are examples of the Clintons having one set of rules for themselves and one for everyone else. Do they have a point?”

Clinton: “I am so proud of the foundation. I’m proud of the work that it has done and it is doing. It attracted donations from people, organizations from around the world and I think that just goes to show that people are very supportive of the lifesaving and life-changing work it’s done here at home and elsewhere. And I’ll let the American people make their own judgments about that.”

  1. “Secretary Clinton, given the situation in Iraq, do you think that we’re better off without Saddam Hussein in power?”

“Look, I know that there’ve been a lot of questions about Iraq posed to candidates over the last weeks. I’ve made it very clear that I made a mistake, plain and simple. And I have written about it in my book; I’ve talked about it in the past. What we now see is a very different and very dangerous situation; the United States is doing what it can but ultimately this has to be a struggle that the Iraqi government and the Iraqi people are determined to win for themselves, and we can provide support but they’re going to have to do it.”

  1. “On your income disclosure recently, that just came out on Friday, you are in the tip-top echelon of earners in this country. How do you expect everyday Americans to relate to you?”

“Well, obviously, Bill and I have been blessed, and we’re very grateful for the opportunities that we had, but we’ve never forgotten where we came from. And we’ve never forgotten the kind of country that we want to see for our granddaughter, and that means that we’re going to fight to make sure that everybody has the same chances to live up to his or her own God-given potential. “So I think that most Americans understand that the deck is stacked for those at the top — and I am running a campaign that is very clearly stating we want to reshuffle that deck, we want to get back to having more opportunity for more people so that they can make more out of their own lives. And I think that’s exactly what America’s looking for.”

  1. “Can you explain your relationship as secretary of state with Sidney Blumenthal? There was a report out this morning that you’ve exchanged several emails. Should Americans expect that if elected president you would have the same type of relationships with these old friends you’ve had for so long?”

[Laughing] “I have many, many old friends, and I always think it’s important, when you get into politics to have friends you had before you were in politics. And to understand what’s on their mind. And he’s been a friend of mine for a long time. He sent me unsolicited emails which I passed on in some instances. And I see that’s just part of the give and take. When you’re in the public eye, when you’re in an official position, I think you do have to work to make sure you’re not caught in a bubble and you only hear from a certain small group of people and I’m going to keep talking to my old friends whoever they are.”

5.-6. “Secretary Clinton, you learned today that [the] State Department might not release your emails until January of 2016. A federal judge says they should be released sooner. Will you demand they are released sooner? And to follow up on the questions about the speeches, was there a conflict of interest in your giving paid speeches into the run-up of your announcement that you’re running for president?”

“The answer to the second is no. And the answer to the first is I have said repeatedly that I want those emails out. Nobody has a bigger interest in getting them released than I do. I respect the State Department; they have their process that they do for everybody, not just for me. But anything that they might do to expedite that process, I heartily support.

“You know, I want the American people to learn as much as we can about the work that I did with our diplomats and our development experts, because I think it will show how hard we worked and what we did for our country during the time that I was secretary of state, where I worked extremely hard on behalf of our values and our interest and our security, and the emails are part of that. So, I have said publicly, I’m repeating it here, in front of all of you today, I want them out as soon as they can get out.”

Follow-up: “But will you demand it? Will you demand it?”

“Well, they’re not mine. They belong to the State Department. So the State Department has to go through its process, but as much as they can expedite that process, that’s what I’m asking them to do, please move as quickly as they possibly can to get them out.”

In any other campaign and in any other scenario, these nothing answers wouldn’t be news. But in Hillaryland, that she even condescends to talk to the press is big news.