Exposing Hillary So She Won't Get Elected

Bernie Sanders Supporter Emily Ratajkowski Almost Had A Horrid Wardrobe Malfunction In A Dress That’s Probably More Expensive Than Your Entire Wardrobe

I only mention that her dress is probably more expensive than your wardrobe, because she’s a Bernie Sanders supporter and therefore allllllll about sharing and caring and equality and fighting against the evils of wealth.

Full disclosure: I didn’t watch the Golden Globes last night. Watching pretentious liberals giving each other the adult equivalent of participation awards? No thanks. I will say, though. I’m into fashion and love sneaking peeks at the attendees’ attire. Mostly because it’s become increasingly atrocious by the years. After some of the looks last night, I’m wholly convinced that celebs will be strutting their stuff completely naked in a matter of years.

Case in point.

Emily Ratajkowski, a model who also happens to be a big time Bernie Sanders supporter (I’m still trying to understand why she supports a socialist when capitalism made her so wealthy and famous. Thinking isn’t exactly her strong suit), decided to sport a gold/yellow dress with a “sexy” slit. Just one problem. She basically showed the entire world her ladyparts. I’m gonna call her design a “v-slit.” It’s all the rage.

Modesty is a symbol of the patriarchy. Feel the liberation, ladies. Ditch the pants. Embrace the “v.” All the cool kids are doing it.

This probably won’t come as a shock to you, but Ratajkowski also believes “in the empowerment of women through sexuality,” which is weird considering how feminists constantly tell us they DON’T want to be judged solely by their reproductive organs.

I’m just waiting for Ratajkowski and her feminist lemmings to screech about how people noticed that she practically showed the entire world her vagina. Like DUDE. HER FACE IS UP HERE. Sexist sickos.

Emily Ratajkowski is living proof that beauty doesn’t always equal brains. Or class, for that matter.

From COTR.